A high-quality and competitive match is predicted, with Bunting likely leading the 180 frequency while Clemens focuses on clinical finishing.

S. Bunting is recognized for a potent scoring game, often producing a high volume of 140+ visits that elevate his three-dart average. His strength lies in the T20 bed, where he can produce multiple maximums in a single leg to distance himself from opponents. G. Clemens possesses a more rhythmic and versatile scoring profile, focusing on consistent 100+ visits to stay within range. Clemens' scoring is often characterized by precision set-up shots that leave high-percentage doubles. While Bunting may lead in total 180s, his ability to avoid sub-60 scores is a vital defensive trait. The battle for scoring supremacy will be won in the mid-leg phase, where Bunting's explosive potential could leave Clemens trailing before the finishing phase begins.

G. Clemens holds a tactical edge in doubles consistency, particularly on Double 16 and Double 18. His clinical approach under doubles pressure makes him a dangerous opponent in tight legs. S. Bunting has shown the ability to hit high checkouts but can occasionally waver if he misses his initial attempt at a double. Bunting must maintain his composure to ensure his scoring efforts aren't negated by Clemens' finishing. The checkout percentage for both players will be the ultimate deciding factor, as the best-of-11 format rewards the player who can maintain their focus and efficiency on the outer ring through the final legs of the match.

Historical data shows a balanced rivalry, but Clemens has displayed superior deciding-leg resilience in their most recent meetings, winning two of their last three encounters in the final leg.

Key themes include Bunting's 'aggressive front-running' versus Clemens' 'counter-punching' style. Clemens will look to exploit any doubles pressure felt by Bunting.

The pressure will be intense in the final legs of this best-of-11 duel. Clemens' ability to maintain his stamina and focus under the lights is his best chance to overcome Bunting's scoring power.

Analytical models favor S. Bunting with a 55% win probability. A 6-4 or 6-5 scoreline is the most likely outcome based on scoring potential.

While S. Bunting provides explosive scoring power, G. Clemens' superior doubles consistency and tactical experience make him a lethal opponent in this longer best-of-11 encounter.