Hartberg 1-5 LASK: Result, 26 Apr 2026
18+ | Gamble responsibly
Final Result
- 48'E. HavelT. Kainz
- 59'M. Aziz
- 89'M. Hoffmann
- 5'X. Mbuyamba
- 30'S. KalajdzicM. Usor
- 46'M. UsorM. Entrup
- 52'M. Cisse
- 57'S. Kalajdzic
- 90+2'C. LangS. Kalajdzic
- 90+5'S. Kalajdzic
Match details
Substitutions
- 46'E. Havel↔L. FridrikasHartberg
- 46'M. Aziz↔H. CoulibalyHartberg
- 46'M. Hennig↔L. PazourekHartberg
- 64'I. Coulibaly↔M. BogardeLASK
- 64'C. Lang↔M. UsorLASK
- 75'K. Danek↔M. EntrupLASK
- 75'D. Korherr↔T. KainzHartberg
- 83'J. Halwachs↔B. MarkusHartberg
- 87'F. Flecker↔G. BelloLASK
- 87'K. Cheikne↔M. CisseLASK
Match Feed
Recent Form
Injury Report
Season Form
League Table
| # | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SK Rapid | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | +14 | 18 | |
| 2 | Salzburg | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | +14 | 17 | |
| 3 | LASK | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | +12 | 16 | |
| 4 | Sturm Graz | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | -1 | 11 | |
| 5 | Ried | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 8 | |
| 6 | Hartberg | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -3 | 8 | |
| 7 | Tirol | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -3 | 8 | |
| 8 | A. Lustenau | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -3 | 8 | |
| 9 | Grazer AK | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -10 | 8 | |
| 10 | Austria Vienna | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -6 | 7 |
Head to Head
Previous Meetings
The analytical model favors LASK with a 45% win probability, while a draw is calculated at 30%. Goal distribution suggests a low-scoring affair, with Under 2.5 goals having a 65% probability based on historical performance data.
- Hartberg scores 1.1 goals per match on average.
- LASK has a 45% win rate in away matches this season.
- 75% of Hartberg’s goals come from inside the penalty area.
- LASK averages 5.5 corners per match.
- Hartberg’s most common scoreline at home is 1-1.
Discipline metrics indicate a high foul count as Hartberg attempts to break LASK’s play. Corner frequency is expected to be moderate, favored slightly toward LASK (avg 5.2).
Hartberg vs LASK Statistical Performance Analysis
20 April 2026Hartberg hosts LASK in a fixture that serves as a critical efficiency test for both sides. Hartberg’s performance model shows a reliance on a compact defensive shape and direct transitional play, whereas LASK prefers a structured build-up emphasizing ball retention. Statistically, LASK possesses higher technical quality, but Hartberg’s home resilience has proven problematic for visiting favorites. The key tactical tension lies in Hartberg’s ability to disrupt LASK’s rhythm in the middle third. If LASK can bypass Hartberg’s initial press, their expected goals (xG) potential increases significantly. Conversely, Hartberg’s efficiency in set-piece delivery remains a potent weapon against a LASK side that occasionally struggles with aerial dominance in their own box.
General expectations suggest a balanced game with LASK holding more possession. The match is likely to be a test of LASK’s patience against a well-drilled Hartberg defensive unit.
Hartberg’s home metrics include a clean sheet ratio of 30%, showing they are capable of defensive grit. Their attacking output is concentrated in the final 20 minutes of play. LASK enters with a superior passing accuracy of 82%, allowing them to control the game's tempo. Defensively, LASK has shown a tendency to concede from wide crosses, a metric where Hartberg ranks in the league’s top half for efficiency. LASK’s strength lies in their midfield interceptions, preventing opponents from building sustained momentum. For Hartberg, success depends on the performance of their pivot players in absorbing LASK’s pressing waves.
High-Efficiency Tactical Setup: LASK utilizes a 4-3-3 with a deep-lying playmaker to bypass the press. Defensive Vulnerability Insight: Hartberg is susceptible to individual errors under high-intensity pressing. High-Impact Substitution Patterns: Hartberg often introduces a second striker late in the game to shift to a more direct 4-4-2.
Head-to-head data shows a high frequency of draws between these two sides, with 40% of their last five meetings ending level. LASK holds a slight edge in total goals scored in this fixture.
LASK’s technical depth should ultimately prevail, though Hartberg’s organized defense will make it a difficult task. The final verdict points to a narrow LASK victory or a competitive draw, with LASK’s structural stability being the deciding factor.
Is a draw likely?+
Yes, historical H2H data and current defensive metrics suggest a 30% probability of a draw.
For informational purposes only. 18+ | Gamble responsibly | begambleaware.org
More Bundesliga matches
- SK Rapid vs Hartberg, 22 Apr 2026
- Sturm Graz vs LASK, 22 Apr 2026
- BW Linz vs Altach, 24 Apr 2026
- Tirol vs Ried, 25 Apr 2026
- Wolfsberger AC vs Grazer AK, 25 Apr 2026
- SK Rapid vs Salzburg, 26 Apr 2026
- Sturm Graz vs Austria Vienna, 26 Apr 2026
- Grazer AK vs Tirol, 2 May 2026
- Ried vs BW Linz, 2 May 2026
- Austria Vienna vs Hartberg, 3 May 2026